Climate change costings that don't count the cost of inaction are worthless

General - Guardian - Key Takeaway: *And with climate change any costings that do not count the costs of inaction are worthless. It would be like doing a costing of investing in the polio vaccine in the 1940s and not considering the cost of people continuing to die and suffer from polio. Clearly the costs of inaction massively outweigh the cost of acting.*

Recente blogposts

Alles weergeven